I experimented with a quick way of arranging interviewees themes and answers in to groups based on my original sub-questions. This was inspired by Miles and Hubermans exploration of approaches to thematic analysis (1999). As well as, the physical immediacy of the Data Poetry exercise we did in class (Lahman et al., 2011).
What are the common mistakes, gaps in portfolios?
What could be the most effective way to address this?
Lahman, M., Rodriguez, K., Richard, V., Geist, M., Schendel, R. and Graglia, P., 2011. (Re)Forming Research Poetry. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(9), pp.887-896.
Miles, M. and Huberman, M., 1999. Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded Sourcebook (2nd Ed.) Matthew B. Miles and A. Michael Huberman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, 1994, 336 pp. The American Journal of Evaluation, 20(1), pp.159-160.